50-Year Study Shows Coral ‘Clocks’ Unreliable

by Brian Thomas, M.S.

Some biologists like to say that massive coral reefs represent more than 100,000 years of growth, supposedly nullifying the Bible’s account of a world that is only thousands of years old. However, many known factors can affect coral reef growth rates. Now, a 50-year study of Caribbean coral reefs confirms the unpredictability of using such growth as a “clock.”

Researchers in the past have assumed that by measuring the rate of growth of a coral reef, as well as the total size of the reef, they can estimate how long it took corals to build it. One big problem with this “natural clock” system is that the growth rate of corals is inconsistent and relies on a host of changing variables.

Coral reef growth rates change with available nutrition, physical weathering, water temperature, light penetration (and therefore sea floor depth or sea level changes), and other factors. Soft corals have soft bodies that do not deposit limestone “homes,” but hard corals can leave behind rocky records if subsequent generations continue to add material. So, since hard corals grow very fast in some conditions and very slow in others, there is no reliable rate of growth to apply when estimating the age of hard coral reefs.

To read more:  http://www.icr.org/article/5885/

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to 50-Year Study Shows Coral ‘Clocks’ Unreliable

  1. Taylor B. says:

    Wow! Very cool!

  2. Kat says:

    Really we needed to prove that. I mean it’s only logical that time isn’t the only factor in a coral reef’s growth you’d think they know by now that there really is no “simple” organism in all of creation. It’s amazing just how blind the blind are, they will blatantly ignore the truth just too make their way of seeing things work.

    I have mixed feelings about this study, at first glance I am upset that a team of scientists had to waste fifty years of their life to prove something so seemingly obvious, but then I realize that I am contradicting myself because there is certainly plenty to learn about everything in creation for if we took everything for what is seems to be then we would see things almost no differently than the blind. Also that team now has proof to back up that there is no 100,000 year old coral reef, and I’m sure all those years of study gave them wealth of information on coral reefs, which is always useful.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s